[spsp-members] Call for Papers on Research Integrity (Synthese)

[Ruphy Stephanie]

Dear colleagues,

We are delighted to announce the launch of a call for papers for a topical collection on research integrity at Synthese.  We look forward to receiving your contributions!

Title 

"Research Integrity, Norms of Good Practices, and Misconduct across Scientific Fields: a Philosophical Perspective"

Deadline

September 1, 2024.

Coordinators

Aurélien Allard (ENS Paris), Cyrille Imbert (CNRS, Lorraine University), Stéphanie Ruphy (ENS Paris)

Summary of the call for papers (more information on the journal's website <https://link.springer.com/collections/jbgccigbfh>)

This topical collection is devoted to investigations related to Research Integrity, Scientific Misconduct and Deviance, and Norms of Good Practices across Scientific Fields. Submissions that directly tackle these questions or relate them to already debated issues such as values in science, the ethics of science, responsible research and innovation, scientific methodology, or the reproducibility crisis in science are welcome.

Appropriate Topics for Submission include, among others:

-Discussions on the causal analysis of scientific misconduct

-Analysis of the individual and collective factors that favor integrity violations

-Conceptual issues related to fraud, misconduct, and questionable research practices

-Classifications of scientific deviance and their suitability for causal claims

-Differences (if any) between the explanation of research integrity violations, questionable research practices, and scientific misconduct

-Norms and rules in science, their rationales, and their relations to research integrity

-Relations between discussions concerning research integrity, science ethics, responsible research and innovation, open science, and scientific methodology

-Biases in research and their relation to research integrity

-Values in Science and their relation to research integrity

-Issues related to the reproducibility/replicability crisis

-Discussions on sample size, statistical power, and related norms

-Methodological discussions about norms of good practices across particular fields

-Ways of decreasing research integrity violations

-Analysis of how to teach research integrity efficiently across scientific communities

-Research integrity within and outside science, e.g., with regards to science communication towards society

-Perspective differences about research integrity between scientific actors

-Differences in perspectives about research integrity between researchers/scientific institutions and other actors (e.g. policy makers, elected officials, private stakeholders)

-Explanations of research integrity violations and misconducts as reported by the media and the political world

-Trust in science and its relation to research integrity

-Political interferences in science and their relation to research integrity

-Similarities and differences between scientific fields on all the above issues

-Differences between private, public, citizen, and regulatory science on all the above issues


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pr. Stéphanie Ruphy
Department of Philosophy
Ecole normale supérieure (ENS Paris) - Université PSL
45, rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris 

President of EPSA (European Philosophy of Science Association <https://philsci.eu/>) 

Director of the French Office for Research Integrity  <https://www.ofis-france.fr/>(Ofis)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.philosophy-science-practice.org/pipermail/spsp-members/attachments/20240324/ce06c63e/attachment.htm>